Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	RE: diff and diff-utils in category base
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Date:	Wed, 15 May 2002 07:13:28 +1000
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
Message-ID:	<FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C60B8@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g4ELDm825095

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:50 AM
> To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
> Cc: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: diff and diff-utils in category base
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:15:12PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >Any reason why diff and diff-utils are in the 'base' category?
> >
> >They seem much more 'devel' to me.
> 
> I assume you've sent a similar query to the Debian people.

Nope. We have been making our decisions here for a while. We've had
several discussions where the debian way wasn't quite what we wanted.

Rob

- Raw text -