Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: diff and diff-utils in category base MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 07:13:28 +1000 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Robert Collins" To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g4ELDm825095 > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:50 AM > To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com > Cc: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: diff and diff-utils in category base > > > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:15:12PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >Any reason why diff and diff-utils are in the 'base' category? > > > >They seem much more 'devel' to me. > > I assume you've sent a similar query to the Debian people. Nope. We have been making our decisions here for a while. We've had several discussions where the debian way wasn't quite what we wanted. Rob