delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:09:44PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >Now, back to the topic: more. Just because util-linux is classified as >BASE by Debian, and we want to follow (within reason) Debian's category >scheme, it does not NECESSARILY follow that every program WITHIN >util-linux should ALSO be a 'base' package -- by splitting things up we >have more flexibility. ('more' might be 'base'able -- but not merely on >the basis of util-linux's position in the Debian category scheme). Thanks, Chuck. What he said. cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |