Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 20:59:09 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: pager in default install
Message-ID: <20020322015909.GB24287@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020321234558 DOT 64036 DOT qmail AT web20005 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <3C9A7648 DOT 7010002 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C9A7648.7010002@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:09:44PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Now, back to the topic: more.  Just because util-linux is classified as 
>BASE by Debian, and we want to follow (within reason) Debian's category 
>scheme, it does not NECESSARILY follow that every program WITHIN 
>util-linux should ALSO be a 'base' package -- by splitting things up we 
>have more flexibility.  ('more' might be 'base'able -- but not merely on 
>the basis of util-linux's position in the Debian category scheme).

Thanks, Chuck.

What he said.

cgf