Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sun, 13 Jan 2002 13:03:15 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers)
Message-ID:	<20020113180315.GA2647@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3C3C8A0E DOT 9000100 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020109183309 DOT GB6261 AT redhat DOT com> <024601c1995d$304b3d10$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C41314E DOT 50406 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <05ec01c19c02$d05b0c20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C4137B5 DOT 2000807 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <060a01c19c06$67e56bf0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020113163642 DOT GB1957 AT redhat DOT com> <3C41C070 DOT 7080102 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3C41C070.7080102@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:14:24PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Didn't I already vote on this?  I can't remember.
>>
>>I say "just do it", too.
>
>I'm waiting for resolution/consensus on the '-' vs. '_' issue...if we 
>*are* going to rename auto*-[stable|devel] to auto*_[stable|devel], I 
>don't want to have to rename the libtool packages too.  I want them 
>named "correctly" from the beginning.

I thought that the consensus (i.e., Robert and me) was that '_' shouldn't
be special.

I don't see any reason to rename libtool-devel to libtool_devel, though.
It is only a problem when there is a number involved after the dash.
There are other packages which use dashes in their names.

cgf

- Raw text -