Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 13:03:15 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ITP: libtool-devel, libtool-stable, libtool (wrappers) Message-ID: <20020113180315.GA2647@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com References: <3C3C8A0E DOT 9000100 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020109183309 DOT GB6261 AT redhat DOT com> <024601c1995d$304b3d10$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C41314E DOT 50406 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <05ec01c19c02$d05b0c20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3C4137B5 DOT 2000807 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <060a01c19c06$67e56bf0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20020113163642 DOT GB1957 AT redhat DOT com> <3C41C070 DOT 7080102 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C41C070.7080102@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:14:24PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Didn't I already vote on this? I can't remember. >> >>I say "just do it", too. > >I'm waiting for resolution/consensus on the '-' vs. '_' issue...if we >*are* going to rename auto*-[stable|devel] to auto*_[stable|devel], I >don't want to have to rename the libtool packages too. I want them >named "correctly" from the beginning. I thought that the consensus (i.e., Robert and me) was that '_' shouldn't be special. I don't see any reason to rename libtool-devel to libtool_devel, though. It is only a problem when there is a number involved after the dash. There are other packages which use dashes in their names. cgf