delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:56:32PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>Splitting is ok but what about just naming the file `ncurses5-5.2-1'? > >>>The package would be nearer to the other ncurses package in setup's > >>>package dialog. > >>> > >> > >>No objections here -- but Red Hat doesn't do it that way (nor does any > >>other RPM-based distro). Don't we want to be like Red Hat? > > > Also, then you'd have "ncurses5" and "ncurses6" -- which contain just > the dll's, along with "ncurses" which contains the executables and man > pages. That just doesn't seem to make much sense to me. ??? I never said so. I was talking about the current package called "ncurses" and the old compatibility package called "curses5". Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |