Mailing-List: contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:20:41 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygapp Subject: Re: [RFD] ncurses update Message-ID: <20010918102041.I22900@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygapp References: <3BA3A5F4 DOT 8010100 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010917182915 DOT C10081 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3BA63755 DOT 9040406 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010917210951 DOT H10081 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3BA68DB0 DOT 20308 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3BA68DB0.20308@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:56:32PM -0400 On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:56:32PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>Splitting is ok but what about just naming the file `ncurses5-5.2-1'? > >>>The package would be nearer to the other ncurses package in setup's > >>>package dialog. > >>> > >> > >>No objections here -- but Red Hat doesn't do it that way (nor does any > >>other RPM-based distro). Don't we want to be like Red Hat? > > > Also, then you'd have "ncurses5" and "ncurses6" -- which contain just > the dll's, along with "ncurses" which contains the executables and man > pages. That just doesn't seem to make much sense to me. ??? I never said so. I was talking about the current package called "ncurses" and the old compatibility package called "curses5". Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc.