X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 20 Dec 2020 15:39:51 +0100 (CET)
From:	Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To:	"Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Problem with Guile 2.2.4 dependency for gEDA
	1.10.1.
In-Reply-To:	<a3f3b383-ebf2-fc8a-6405-e1d69c2a6838@epilitimus.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.21.2012201535440.17210@nimbus>
References:	<f5ab1b6f-dbf3-4be3-a43f-eb74b32b7a51 AT fastmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012190043450 DOT 7556 AT nimbus> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012191400380 DOT 24569 AT nimbus> <20201219180603 DOT 22277 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <a3f3b383-ebf2-fc8a-6405-e1d69c2a6838 AT epilitimus DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 19 Dec 2020, Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> I am willing to write the patch if needed.

Thank you!  I really appreciate that. :-)

In this case, I had a specific way of solving this issue in mind which 
would not make the (already kind of confusing) code more complicated, so I 
patched it myself.  But there is another thing where you could help:

Would you mind finding out versions of the build dependencies are actually
necessary?

I don't expect you to hunt down every API change in every tool and library 
used (that would be a tremendous effort); simply knowing that version X.Y 
compiles successfully and doesn't show any obvious problems when running 
would already be very helpful.

Roland

- Raw text -