X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:47:10 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To:	"Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] submitted a new patch
In-Reply-To:	<7c133ba2-5b09-91f3-808f-9f444c625278@epilitimus.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.21.2010151343310.1527@nimbus>
References:	<14f9e862-8ee0-4432-23b6-06e94215baa4 AT epilitimus DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2010120958150 DOT 2535 AT nimbus> <32bfe083-3604-b747-030a-48a13e2b1074 AT epilitimus DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2010122312420 DOT 8245 AT nimbus>
	<7c133ba2-5b09-91f3-808f-9f444c625278 AT epilitimus DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hi Glenn,

On Wed, 14 Oct 2020, Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> I have the patch ready. Do you prefer I do an actual bug report like
> before or just send it to you here.

either way is fine.

> I am also thinking about writing up what I am thinking about doing as
> you or others might have suggestions as to a better way to accomplish it
> given you all are more familiar with the existing geda architecture.

Sure, let us know!  That said, the best way to get something implemented 
is usually to submit a patch; it's always easier (and therefore more 
likely to happen) to improve something than to do it from scratch.

> Also, I was having trouble with the -L switch in gnetlist when used with 
> the -p switch. That is for version 1.10.0 so it may have been fixed 
> since. I can send you more detail if you want.

Yes, please.  I can only fix issues I know about.

Roland

- Raw text -