X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:47:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Roland Lutz To: "Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Subject: Re: [geda-user] submitted a new patch In-Reply-To: <7c133ba2-5b09-91f3-808f-9f444c625278@epilitimus.com> Message-ID: References: <14f9e862-8ee0-4432-23b6-06e94215baa4 AT epilitimus DOT com> <32bfe083-3604-b747-030a-48a13e2b1074 AT epilitimus DOT com> <7c133ba2-5b09-91f3-808f-9f444c625278 AT epilitimus DOT com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Hi Glenn, On Wed, 14 Oct 2020, Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I have the patch ready. Do you prefer I do an actual bug report like > before or just send it to you here. either way is fine. > I am also thinking about writing up what I am thinking about doing as > you or others might have suggestions as to a better way to accomplish it > given you all are more familiar with the existing geda architecture. Sure, let us know! That said, the best way to get something implemented is usually to submit a patch; it's always easier (and therefore more likely to happen) to improve something than to do it from scratch. > Also, I was having trouble with the -L switch in gnetlist when used with > the -p switch. That is for version 1.10.0 so it may have been fixed > since. I can send you more detail if you want. Yes, please. I can only fix issues I know about. Roland