delorie.com/pcb/transparencies/
|
search
|
Toner Transfer via Transparency Experiments
Equipment
- GBC Creative Laminator,
with an external temperature controller
- Apollo CG7060 Laser Transparency Film
- HP CP2025 Color Laser Printer
Baseline Tests
To learn about transparencies, temperatures, and techniques for
Toner Transfer, I took the time to run a series of tests. For each
set of tests, my laminator's temperature was varied from 320 to 360 F
(with ample time between changes to settle), and the number of passes
through the laminator was varied from 1 to 12 passes (rotating 90
degrees between passes). For each test, a 2.25 inch square PCB was
thoroughly cleaned with sovlent (if needed), then Dawn and a green
scrubbie, and the pcb and film were sandwiched in a folded piece of
paper "pocket" to avoid slippage and/or sticking to the rollers.
The grid below is one row per temperature, with columns for 1, 4, 8,
and 12 passes, click on any thumbnail for closeups:
320 F
330 F
340 F
350 F
360 F
Observations
I note that there are two types of "transfers" - shiny and matte.
I don't know why they differ (perhaps the matte spots are where the
rollers stuck the toner to the pcb, and it pulled away while it was
hot, but the shiny parts are where it remained in contact with the
film until it cooled), but if you reflect a light off the board, you
can see that both have transferred to the pcb, they just look
different. The transparencies only show residual toner where there
are obvious spots of missing toner.
Additional Tests
Based on the above, looking at unstuck toner and spread due to
squishing, I chose the 320 F 8-pass result as a control for some other
things to try:
|
Theory: something was wrong with the toner on the film, so
transferring a second film on top of the first would provide a "good"
spot of toner wherever the first was "bad".
Test: 8 passes. Cool. Remove film, align a second film over the
first transfer. 8 more passes.
Result: Suitable for larger design rules - being off by even a few
thou makes a big difference in the results. However, it did fill in
the gaps and provide a thicker layer of toner.
|
|
Theory: pre-heating the PCB before applying the film would give
more stick with less spread
Test: 4 passes without the film, followed by 4 passes with the
film
Result: There was still some spread but the results were
acceptable
|
|
Theory: variations in the paper "pocket" were affecting the
lamination.
Test: One pass in the paper pocket, the remaining 7 without it.
Results: Indeed, the transfer was more consistent. However, it
appears the paper was also acting as insulation, so there was more
spreading. A lower temperature should be tried.
|
|
Theory: The unevenness of the copper due to the underlying FR4 was
causing uneven pressure and missed spots.
Test: The PCB was sanded to 2000 grit, resulting in a mirror-like
surface.
Results: It's hard to see in the photos as the copper was reflects
enough light in the scanner that it appears dark, but there was very
poor adhesion of the toner! This was a very unexpected result - the
toner needs a mechanical bond to transfer. Scuff it!
|