Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2001 16:24:06 +0200
From: Sebastian Ude <ude AT handshake DOT de>
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: confusion about patches on PGCC web site:
In-Reply-To: <3B18D3F3.8050709@cadvision.com>
References: <3B18D3F3 DOT 8050709 AT cadvision DOT com>
X-Mailer: Spruce 0.7.6 for X11 w/smtpio 0.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <20010602141013.0053F96D47@sender.ngi.de>
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Sat, 02 Jun 2001, somervil AT cadvision DOT com wrote:
> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2001 05:54:27 -0600
> To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
> From: somervil AT cadvision DOT com (robert somerville)
> Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: confusion about patches on PGCC web site:
> 
> i am not completly clear on which which patch to apply to
> which version of gcc anymore, __HELP__

The last official patch is against gcc 2.95.2.1:

http://goof.com/pcg/data/source/gcc-2.95.2.1-pgcc-2.95.2.1.diff.gz


There is an inofficial patch for gcc 2.95.3 from Dean Scott:

ftp://projects.sourceforge.net/pub/u4x/packages/SOURCES/gcc-2.95.3-pgcc-2.95.3-u4x.diff.gz