Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 13:47:29 +0100
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: pgcc-2.95.2.1 vs. glibc-2.2.2 test-suit failed.
Message-ID: <20010225134729.A18184@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References: <20010225181117 DOT A18753 AT ljm DOT qqjane DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010225181117.A18753@ljm.qqjane.net>; from ljm@ljm.qqjane.net on Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 06:11:17PM +0800
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.4.2-ac3 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version 2.95.2.1 19991024 (release)) 
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 06:11:17PM +0800, Lin Zhemin <ljm AT ljm DOT qqjane DOT net> wrote:
> Most glibc-2.2.2 test-suites passed but one had not:

Most probably this is caused by the relatively flaky inline math functions.
It should go away when you compile with -D__NO_MATH_INLINES

>  is:          6.04367733001708984375e-01   0x1.356fb000000000000000p-1
>  should be:   6.04367792606353759766e-01   0x1.356fb200000000000000p-1
>  difference:  5.96046447753906250000e-08   0x1.00000000000000000000p-24

Looks like a wrong double->float conversion somewhere.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |