Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:35:57 +0200 From: Marc Lehmann To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Problems compiling kernel with pgcc 2.95.2 Message-ID: <20000722103557.B665@cerebro.laendle> Mail-Followup-To: Marc Lehmann , pgcc AT delorie DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.1i In-Reply-To: ; from strasbur@chkw386.ch.pwr.wroc.pl on Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 10:50:28AM +0000 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.16 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.95.2 19991024 (release) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 10:50:28AM +0000, Krzysztof Strasburger wrote: > >message after lilo with most of the dots, then the machine reboots. > Pgcc probably inserts P6 instructions into the code, even if it should not > do it. It should ;) When you configure pgcc for i686 when compiling it, it will of course compile startup-objects and libgcc with p6 optimizations. It will then be able to compile p5-only programs, but you will not be able to link them ;) If you ./configure i585-pc-linux-gnu for example, it will happily generate pentium-code (as a matter of fact my answering machine is a 486 and pgcc compiles code for it just fine). -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT opengroup DOT org |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |