Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 03:59:01 +0100
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT opengroup DOT org>
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: PGCC V2.95.2
Message-ID: <19991111035901.P14481@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References: <NDBBJOMCOLJHIPPDDKGBEEAJCAAA DOT dgouthro AT home DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <NDBBJOMCOLJHIPPDDKGBEEAJCAAA.dgouthro@home.com>; from Daniel Gouthro on Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 03:15:07AM -0500
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.13 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version 2.95.1 19990816 (release)) 
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 03:15:07AM -0500, Daniel Gouthro <dgouthro AT home DOT com> wrote:
>    utility. I found older precompiled PGCC V1.01 for DOS. I like to have
>    "precompiled" PGCC V2.95.2 for DOS and would put into ZIP file so I
>    can extract them very quickly.

Yeah, probably many people would like to have it. However, nobody has
compiled one for me so far.

(btw, it's pgcc, not PGCC)

Your options thus are:

- bug the "current" binary maintainer for djgpp-pgcc for a new version
- find somebody to do it for you, and, preferably, make him upload
  it to out server.

>    Do PGCC V2.95.2 fixes all optimization bugs over PGCC V1.01?

This question does not make sense to me.... There is no way to detect "all
optimization bugs" so it's impossible to know wether all these have been
fixed ;)

However, I still expect quite a few bugs in pgcc-2.95.2...

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT opengroup DOT org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |