From: "Daniel Gouthro" To: Subject: PGCC V2.95.2 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 03:15:07 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01BF2B29.C9FB3400" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01BF2B29.C9FB3400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You released PGCC V2.95.2 source. However it end with .gz file and I have DJGPP's GCC V2.95.1 for DOS but do not have tar and gunzip utility. I found older precompiled PGCC V1.01 for DOS. I like to have "precompiled" PGCC V2.95.2 for DOS and would put into ZIP file so I can extract them very quickly. Do PGCC V2.95.2 fixes all optimization bugs over PGCC V1.01? Thank you, much! From, Daniel Carl Gouthro Email: dgouthro AT home DOT com ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01BF2B29.C9FB3400 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

You released PGCC = V2.95.2=20 source. However it end with .gz file and I have DJGPP's GCC V2.95.1 for = DOS but=20 do not have tar and gunzip utility. I found older precompiled PGCC V1.01 = for=20 DOS. I like to have "precompiled" PGCC V2.95.2 for DOS and would put = into ZIP=20 file so I can extract them very quickly.

Do PGCC V2.95.2 = fixes all=20 optimization bugs over PGCC V1.01?

Thank you,=20 much!

From,

Daniel Carl Gouthro

Email: dgouthro AT home DOT com

------=_NextPart_000_0000_01BF2B29.C9FB3400--