Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 17:54:00 +0100
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT opengroup DOT org>
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Improvement
Message-ID: <19991108175400.C8828@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References: <3820E789 DOT 3A0B33F8 AT cup DOT hp DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <3820E789.3A0B33F8@cup.hp.com>; from Dara Hazeghi on Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 05:55:21PM -0800
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.13 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version 2.95.1 19990816 (release)) 
Sender: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 05:55:21PM -0800, Dara Hazeghi <sassan AT cup DOT hp DOT com> wrote:
> but enough). Thanks for the great release guys.

Thanks for using it ;)

> As an aside, can anyone explain whether there is a gcc equivalent to the
> DJGPP _control87()? I have a program which relies on it and refuses to
> build because of it (or rather because it isn't found).

this is, of course, not a gcc issue but depends on the system you
use. For linux for example you are probably interested in reading
/usr/include/fpu_control.h, but I admit I am not sure what _control87 is
supposed to do.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT opengroup DOT org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |