Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 19:18:34 +0200
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT opengroup DOT org>
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: profiling option -pg
Message-ID: <19990917191834.C4203@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References: <C12567EE DOT 002D262C DOT 00 AT lotusout DOT star DOT be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <C12567EE.002D262C.00@lotusout.star.be>; from jle@star.be on Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 10:18:23AM +0200
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.12 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) 
Sender: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 10:18:23AM +0200, jle AT star DOT be wrote:
> BUT, if I use the -O option, gprof complains about missing data in the
> gmon.out file.
> 
> Is it a bug, or an expected behaviour for pgcc-2.95.1 ?

Not expected (thus a bug), but I admit I do not profile my code very
often.  This sounds easy enough to reproduce, so I'll try to fix it (after
my vacation).

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |