Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 16:29:59 +0300 (EEST) From: Erhan Bilgili To: Steve Snyder cc: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: ICE in pgcc v2.95.1 with -O3 or greater In-Reply-To: <37C53A7A.781F6773@home.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > After downloading the pgcc v2.95.1 SRPMS from Erhan Bilgili's site > (ftp://ftp.deu.edu.tr/pub/linux/PentiumGCC/SRPM/pgcc-2.95.1-1.src.rpm), > I attempted to build it on my RedHat 6.0 (with v2.2.11 kernel) system. hello, hmm... interesting ... i used the compiler to built lots of tools but with -mk6 and -mpentiumpro -O6 -fexpensive-optimizations and many other stuff . everything worked fine and compile without errors . > I initially attempted to build the SRPM with the switches "-mcpu=i585 -O3" > (this is the value of the RPM_OPT_FLAGS used in the spec file). Doing so > caused an internal compiler error (ICE) when the 2nd stage of the build > process began. I backed it down to "-mcpu=i585 -O2" and the compiler > built successfully. > > After installing the newly-built pgcc binaries, I attempted to rebuild the > glibc libraries (in the form of glibc-2.1.1-7.src.rpm). Again I found > that "-mcpu=i585 -O3" whould cause an ICE, where "-mcpu=i585 -O2" would > not. > > Has anyone else seen this problem? > > One thing I should note: I am using binutils v2.9.1.0.23, as provided by > RH 6.0, where v2.9.1.0.25 is recommended. Could this be a factor in my > inability to go above -O2 optimization? Where can a find a (S)RPM of > binutils v2.9.1.0.25? i have the SRPM of the beta binutils 2.9.5.0.8 and 2.9.5.0.5 . i used both without problems . Erhan Bilgili > Thank you. > >