Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 09:42:20 +0200
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: pgcc and linux-2.2.9 DMA problem
Message-ID: <19990726094220.H19462@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References: <37911716 DOT 7A691225 AT netplus DOT net> <Pine DOT SOL DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 990718012951 DOT 11121C-100000 AT ursa DOT cus DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <19990720095916 DOT N263 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <379AE22E DOT DB97A916 AT netplus DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <379AE22E.DB97A916@netplus.net>; from Steve Bergman on Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 05:08:46AM -0500
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.10 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version egcs-2.91.66 19990314 (egcs-1.1.2 release) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) 
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 05:08:46AM -0500, Steve Bergman wrote:
> optimization.  It seems that I have heard that this does not work, and
> indeed, it only gets a few seconds into the compile before dying.  Does this
> fact strike anyone else as odd?

No, the linux kernel does not provide for non-optimized builds.

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |