Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 09:22:51 +0200
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Creation of gcc cross compilers for NT and Win95.
Message-ID: <19990720092251.I263@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 32 DOT 19990719212304 DOT 010f3790 AT pop DOT xs4all DOT nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19990719212304.010f3790@pop.xs4all.nl>; from Vincent Diepeveen on Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 09:23:23PM +0100
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.10 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version egcs-2.91.66 19990314 (egcs-1.1.2 release) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) 
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 09:23:23PM +0100, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
> i tried to make a cross compiler that ran under linux-PII450 that could
> produce alpha executables, but after a few months i still didn't
> succeed.

Hmm, it should work fine, whats going wrong? (Of course, this list is not
quite the right forum for cross compilers ;)

> I'm still very interested in a cross compiler for the alpha, even
> if that's only producing 32 bits code and not 64 bits.

the cross compiler will quite happily produce 64 bit code, however it will be
slower than a native compiler, if that is what you mean.

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |