Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 09:11:21 +0200
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Cc: valdand AT soften DOT ktu DOT lt
Subject: Re: cse bug?
Message-ID: <19990720091121.F263@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com, valdand AT soften DOT ktu DOT lt
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 9907161649360 DOT 13819-100000 AT diedas DOT soften DOT ktu DOT lt>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907161649360.13819-100000@diedas.soften.ktu.lt>; from Valdas Andrulis on Fri, Jul 16, 1999 at 05:08:10PM +0200
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.10 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version egcs-2.91.66 19990314 (egcs-1.1.2 release) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) 
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 16, 1999 at 05:08:10PM +0200, Valdas Andrulis wrote:
> >
> 
> No, not segfault. It generates weird hash values. If i put ( key, value )
> pair in hash database, and then try to get it using a key, none is found.

Ok, thanks, I'll look.

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |