Message-ID: <379378F8.F9386326@softhome.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 21:14:00 +0200
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: lt,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
CC: poulard AT laas DOT fr, poulard AT actia DOT fr
Subject: Re: pgcc port for WinNT
References: <420810190799*/S=hpoulard/O=actia/PRMD=actia/ADMD=atlas/C=fr/@MHS>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com

hpoulard AT actia DOT fr wrote:
> 2/ will pgcc with the patch be more
>    efficient than the strict pure egcs ?
>    I guess It will, Nevertheless am hoping :-)
> 3/ Will it be more efficient than VC++5,
>    AM HOPE

Visit http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/compila.html .
Here you will find comprehensive speed comparison 
of VC++, Watcom C++, GCC 2.7.2 - 2.8.1, EGCS/PGCC 1.0.x - 1.1.x,
and still unreleased GCC 2.95/2.96 snapshots.
Also there is analysis of generated assembler code of two
best compilers.

Laurynas Biveinis