From: "Steve Snyder" <swsnyder AT home DOT com>
To: "pgcc AT delorie DOT com" <pgcc AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 20:33:48 -0400 (EST)
X-Mailer: PMMail 2.00.1500 for OS/2 Warp 4.00
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19990713233149.0110d2f0@pop.xs4all.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Kernel Optimization and RH 6
Message-Id: <19990714013346.QINE8809.mail.rdc1.il.home.com@mercury.snydernet.lan>
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 23:31:51 +0100, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>At 05:20 PM 7/12/99 -0600, you wrote:
>>Are the lines below the best option to compile a 2.2.x kernel with
>>egcs/pgcc running on a Pentium II?
>
>-mpentiumpro gives me several tens of slower code for my programs
>using pgcc or gcc or egcs
>
>I'm having a pentium pro 200 and a PII-450

How do you know that the generated code is slower?

*** Steve Snyder ***