Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 23:24:53 +0200 To: "'pgcc AT delorie DOT com'" Subject: Re: K7 potentials Message-ID: <19990708232453.A24204@cerebro.laendle> Mail-Followup-To: "'pgcc AT delorie DOT com'" References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from Henrik Berglund SdU on Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 02:27:30PM +0200 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.10 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version egcs-2.91.66 19990314 (egcs-1.1.2 release) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) From: Marc Lehmann Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 02:27:30PM +0200, Henrik Berglund SdU wrote: > > My chess program is also using long longs and is miscompiled by > > pgcc-1.1.3 as well. With pgcc-1.1.1 I do not experience problems. > Seems like something went wrong between release 1.1.1 and 1.1.2. > Have a k6-2 and 1.1.1 optimized better than the latest release. This indicates that Jan was correct in diagnosing that egcs had much worse k6 support than pgcc, since I dropped the pgcc K6 support in favour of the (presumably) better k6 support in egcs. It would be interesting to know how the pgcc snapshots performa relative to pgcc-1.1.1. Any volunteerss to port the changes back? -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |