From: Eugene Leitl <eugene DOT leitl AT lrz DOT uni-muenchen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon,  5 Jul 1999 13:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: RE: K7 potentials
In-Reply-To: <000201bec6bb$2124dac0$41d16482@ellemtel.se>
References: <377EAA7B DOT 2938D401 AT recomnet DOT net>
	<000201bec6bb$2124dac0$41d16482 AT ellemtel DOT se>
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs  Lucid
Message-ID: <14209.5222.833172.825211@lrz.de>
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

David Jonsson writes:

 > > > Well, K7 550 MHz 109% SPECint_base95 and 146% SPECfp_base95 if
 > > > compared to a 550 MHz Pentium III.
 > 
 > You have not read the figures correctly. The figures are 9-46% faster or 109-146% _of_ the performance of a PIII 550 MHz. 

While I was saying?