From: "David Jonsson" <David DOT Jonsson AT ellemtel DOT se>
To: <pgcc AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: K7 potentials
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 08:51:03 +0100
Message-ID: <000201bec6bb$2124dac0$41d16482@ellemtel.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
In-Reply-To: <377EAA7B.2938D401@recomnet.net>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id DAA03197
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Eugene Leitl wrote:
> 
> > David Jonsson writes:
> >
> >  > Expect 10-50% more than PIII. Look at www.amd.se
> >
> > Well, K7 550 MHz 109% SPECint_base95 and 146% SPECfp_base95 if
> > compared to a 550 MHz Pentium III.

You have not read the figures correctly. The figures are 9-46% faster or 109-146% _of_ the performance of a PIII 550 MHz. 

David