Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:03:12 +0200 To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: pgcc does better, reboot, then does terrible! Message-ID: <19990621230312.Q25668@cerebro.laendle> Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com References: <19990617231401 DOT A968 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <199906190750 DOT CAA23996 AT ux12 DOT cso DOT uiuc DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <199906190750.CAA23996@ux12.cso.uiuc.edu>; from jonathan c mckinney on Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 02:50:14AM -0500 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.3.6 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.95 19990524 (prerelease) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) From: Marc Lehmann Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Jun 19, 1999 at 02:50:14AM -0500, jonathan c mckinney wrote: > Well, pgcc = egcs+patches, so not sure what your point is. The point is that egcs != pgcc. > And I already said that I used the -mcpu=pentiumpro and > -march=pentiumpro compile options on both with no errors, so you can't > be right in thinking I used the old egcs. > I KNOW that's not the case. Well, _something_ in your mail _must_ be wrong. Either the excerpts (see below) from the binary (which show that egcs was the compiler) are inco,plete or wrong, or you did not use pgcc. > You a newbie too? Probably. > > On Thu, Jun 17, 1999 at 03:46:38AM -0500, JonMcK wrote: > > > 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)^@^@GCC: (GNU) egcs-2.91.66 > > > 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)^@^@GCC: (GNU) egcs-2.91.66 > > > 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 > > > release)^^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^A^@^@^@01.01^@^@^^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^A^@^@^@01.01 No sign of pgcc. -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |