Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 16:48:40 -0400
From: Igor Schein <igor AT txc DOT com>
To: Pgcc Mailing List <pgcc AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: pow() bug
Message-Id: <19990621164840.I28893@io.txc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6us
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

in the latest CVS sources ( Jun 21 ) the function pow() is broken.  If
the level of optimization is -O1 or higher, pow(a,b) returns 1.0 for
any double a,b.  Without any optimization it gives the correct answer.

Thanks

Igor