Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:53:51 -0600
From: Daniel Robbins <drobbins AT swcp DOT com>
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: PGCC and EGCS question
Message-ID: <19990614165351.A892@enoch.weebletron.net>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 9906011026090 DOT 8220-100000 AT ns DOT nogimmicks DOT com> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 9906030705090 DOT 13696-100000 AT ns DOT nogimmicks DOT com> <19990603213117 DOT D15111 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <19990612103853 DOT A18024 AT enoch DOT weebletron DOT net> <19990613234201 DOT A5893 AT cerebro DOT laendle>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
In-Reply-To: <19990613234201.A5893@cerebro.laendle>; from Marc Lehmann on Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 11:42:01PM +0200
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 11:42:01PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> 
> As a sidenote, I just looked at the page: what are you refering to when
> you write "Xwindows"? do you mean the X Window System or a special version
> of windows (as the name suggests ;) (IAW: I urge you to correct the
> spelling ;)

Fixed.

> Also, the link to pgcc on that page is bogus.

Fixed.

> PS: Would you like a backlink on the pgcc webpages?

Yes I would, that would be great!  Thanks for pointing out the "quirks" on my
web page; I'm sure you know how sometimes web pages can take a back seat when 
there's development work goin' on ;)

Also, thanks for your work on pgcc and your suggestions.  One of the neat 
things about Enoch is that I can target 3 different processor types with 5 
different builds -- this wouldn't be possible without your work.  Let me know
if you have any suggestions or comments about the distribution in general.
I know that if I design a distribution that *you* enjoy using, then I've done
something right.

Best Regards,

-- 
Daniel Robbins
Chief Architect
Enoch GNU/Linux
drobbins AT swcp DOT com