Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 23:04:22 +0200 To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: PGCC and EGCS question Message-ID: <19990613230422.D31417@cerebro.laendle> Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com References: <19990603213117 DOT D15111 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <19990612103853 DOT A18024 AT enoch DOT weebletron DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <19990612103853.A18024@enoch.weebletron.net>; from Daniel Robbins on Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 10:38:53AM -0600 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.3.6 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.95 19990524 (prerelease) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) From: Marc Lehmann Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 10:38:53AM -0600, Daniel Robbins wrote: > Question: is there a version of pgcc that is available (1.1.1? 1.0.3?) that can > compile itself properly using all of the following compile options: > > -O6 -mpentium > -O6 -mpentiumpro > -O6 -mpentium -march=pentium > -O6 -mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro > -O6 -mamdk6 1.1.1 should, 1.1.3 does not (at least not for all people). The snapshot should. The egcs version does not have these high optimization levels, so the answer is, strictly speaking, no in that case as well ;) If you use -O2, however, both egcs and pgcc should be able to recompile themselves. > If not, is there a version of egcs that will suit our needs? Or is there a > work-around for pgcc? Or when can we expect a fix for the -mpentiumpro > compiler flag? :) Yes, in the next release (probably pgcc-2.95 ;) -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |