Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 23:22:58 +0200
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Signal 11 in Xservers
Message-ID: <19990608232258.W5168@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References: <375A4A36 DOT 8729F3A4 AT casema DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <375A4A36.8729F3A4@casema.net>; from Martijn Kruithof on Sun, Jun 06, 1999 at 12:15:18PM +0200
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.7 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.93.09 19990221 (gcc2 ss-980929 experimental) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) 
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jun 06, 1999 at 12:15:18PM +0200, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
> Hello, 
> 
> I am not yet on the mailinglist
> 
> I hv had the same error described by johnny.
> When compiling XFree86 with the -fno-force-mem
> everything works fine.

Which server did you use? And when did the server segfault?

> options used: -march=pentiumpro -O6 -fno-force-mem.
> works, removing this leads to the error(s) described in
> the message <37420FEF DOT 9CCA9C9 AT theglobe DOT com>
> btw how did you get the server to core dump?

(probably by setting the corresponding ulimit)

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |