Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 23:17:32 +0200 To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: trouble compiling gcc as cross-compiler to m68k Message-ID: <19990608231732.T5168@cerebro.laendle> Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from Johnny Casey on Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 11:17:58AM -0700 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.7 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.93.09 19990221 (gcc2 ss-980929 experimental) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) From: Marc Lehmann Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 11:17:58AM -0700, Johnny Casey wrote: > correct me if i am wrong, but glibc 2.x defines a lot of string > functions (*str*) with hand tuned macros and *a lot* of older source > decided to not use headers when all they wanted was one function > definition. Worse, they decided to add prototypes BUT ALSO included the header file ;) > offending definition. this also appears with rogue definitions of > sys_error not being as generous with const as the recent glibc. -D__NO_STRING_INLINES -D__NO_MATH_INLINES might help with the string and math functions (but not with missing const). -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |