Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 11:15:38 -0400
From: Igor Schein <igor AT txc DOT com>
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Benchmark PGCC vs EGCS on a K6-2
Message-Id: <19990526111538.B1694@puck.txc.com>
References: <373F3AA2 DOT A446D611 AT informatik DOT hu-berlin DOT de> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 9905181826020 DOT 1284-100000 AT data DOT mandrakesoft DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5us
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9905181826020.1284-100000@data.mandrakesoft.com>; from Bernhard Rosenkraenzer on Tue, May 18, 1999 at 06:26:47PM +0000
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 06:26:47PM +0000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 1999, Jens-Uwe Rumstich wrote:
> 
> > - allthough EGCS does not have specific K6-options, the fastest
> > combination wsas found with EGCS, not with PGCC
> 
> Try pgcc with -O6 -mk6 -march=k6 -pipe -s -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
> -fomit-frame-pointer

pgcc FAQ says that -fomit-frame-point is already activated with -O5,
so -O6 should also imply it.  So I don't get it, why are you listing
it here?  Does the FAQ lie?

Thanks

Igor