Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 13:19:41 +0000 (GMT)
From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero AT mandrakesoft DOT com>
X-Sender: linux AT data DOT mandrakesoft DOT com
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Benchmark PGCC vs EGCS on a K6-2
In-Reply-To: <19990521105104.58741@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9905211319210.923-100000@data.mandrakesoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 21 May 1999, Jan Hubicka wrote:

> Just a simple question. As I remember, the latest pgcc patch is relative
> to quite old version of egcs (1.1.x times).
> In the recent week, many of my and John's i386 patches was accepted to egcs,
> so I believe making changes relative to old pgcc will bring you lots of problems
> while updating patch for new egcs snapshots. Do you have somewhere pgcc patches
> updated for this version, so I can do it there?

Get the current CVS version at :pserver:guest AT goof DOT com:/home/pcg/cvs

LLaP
bero