Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 23:38:04 +0200 To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Benchmark PGCC vs EGCS on a K6-2 Message-ID: <19990520233804.K248@cerebro.laendle> Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com References: <373F3AA2 DOT A446D611 AT informatik DOT hu-berlin DOT de> <19990519105631 DOT 40676 AT atrey DOT karlin DOT mff DOT cuni DOT cz> <3743ADE8 DOT C938ADBB AT informatik DOT hu-berlin DOT de> <19990520104723 DOT 18724 AT atrey DOT karlin DOT mff DOT cuni DOT cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <19990520104723.18724@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>; from Jan Hubicka on Thu, May 20, 1999 at 10:47:23AM +0200 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.9 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.91.66 19990314 (egcs-1.1.2 release) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) From: Marc Lehmann Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 10:47:23AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hmm... don't know. You might also try out egcs benchmark suite. It gets > lots of results and they are pretty exact (at least for me) and useable for > tunning the compiler. Take a look at egcs homepage to get it... However, the benchmark pages are not very helpful (yet) in determining where to get it, I'm supposed to change that, but when.... ;( In short, its only available through egcs cvs. You can follow the instructions to check out the egcs source tree, but instead of entering cvs co egcs just enter cvs co benchmarks > optimization for Pentium CPU. This change caused performance loss due to reduced > pairing oportunities. > It should not affect non-riscified code anyway. It does, about as rarely as it does affect riscified code ;) -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |