Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 23:51:02 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Henrik Berglund  SdU <adb94hbd AT mds DOT mdh DOT se>
X-Sender: adb94hbd AT legolas DOT mdh DOT se
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: K6 & i686 ASM code
In-Reply-To: <37432DFD.40490BB4@lycosmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9905192348140.959-100000@legolas.mdh.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 19 May 1999, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:

> Can the K6(or -2 or III) use i686 ASM code??? Does it support all the
> same instructions??? 
not all instructions, i compiled bytemark with -march=i686 and get
unknown instruction error.

> I know that the scheduling probably won't be
> optimal, but I would also wonder if it may be better than i586 asm.
use -march=k6 



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henrik DOT Berglund AT mds DOT mdh DOT se 
http://www.mds.mdh.se/~adb94hbd/