Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 18:26:47 +0000 (GMT)
From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero AT mandrakesoft DOT com>
X-Sender: linux AT data DOT mandrakesoft DOT com
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Benchmark PGCC vs EGCS on a K6-2
In-Reply-To: <373F3AA2.A446D611@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9905181826020.1284-100000@data.mandrakesoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 16 May 1999, Jens-Uwe Rumstich wrote:

> - allthough EGCS does not have specific K6-options, the fastest
> combination wsas found with EGCS, not with PGCC

Try pgcc with -O6 -mk6 -march=k6 -pipe -s -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
-fomit-frame-pointer

LLaP
bero