Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 18:52:11 +0200
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Haifa
Message-ID: <19990516185211.D1193@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References: <36DD6D94 DOT 79AFEC8F AT mitre DOT org> <373B36E0 DOT 9B6F9E7F AT mitre DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <373B36E0.9B6F9E7F@mitre.org>; from Philip Long on Thu, May 13, 1999 at 04:32:33PM -0400
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.7 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.93.09 19990221 (gcc2 ss-980929 experimental) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) 
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 04:32:33PM -0400, Philip Long wrote:
> When building pgcc/egcs, which scheduler should we choose for various x86s?

Good question, the one that behaves better. At the moment the "old"
scheduler and the haifa scheduler both can perform better than each other
under some circumstances.

The haifa scheduler, however, is more modern and more capable. ITs also
the one I use myself and the one I'd recommend.

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |