Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 22:05:45 +0200
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: pgcc... Do I really got it ?
Message-ID: <19990429220545.D271@cerebro.laendle>
Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References: <37282C1C DOT F6758A83 AT duboi DOT com> <m10cq5U-001mHUC AT Dirac DOT Chemie DOT FU-Berlin DOT DE>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <m10cq5U-001mHUC@Dirac.Chemie.FU-Berlin.DE>; from Bernd Melchers on Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 02:38:44PM +0200
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.7 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.93.09 19990221 (gcc2 ss-980929 experimental) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) 
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > when vanilla gcc -O3  runs in 54 secs,
> > pgcc -O6 ..[killer options]... runs in 53.5 secs.

Can you tell me more about the prog? Is it fp-intensive?

> 
> so you get 1 % performance increase, great! I would like to have
> 1 % of Bill Gates money!

1% really isn't enough...

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |