Sender: alex AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <37218BB3.C34551FD@home.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 16:15:31 +0700
From: Alexander Rodyukov <simuran AT home DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.4 i686)
X-Accept-Language: ru, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: PGCC 1.1.3, what's different????
References: <19990423171922 DOT 15793 DOT qmail AT www0j DOT netaddress DOT usa DOT net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com

ADAM SCHROTENBOER wrote:
> 
> What was changed w/ 1.1.3, other than the fact that it apparrently compiles
> now?
> 
> Was the problem fixed, or removed???
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

Hm, pretty stupid question... were you got it?!
Latest on their web-site (and ftp) is 1.1.2., latest from CVS
was (yesterday): 

BOLiVAR:/BUILD[$] /BUILD/usr/bin/gcc -v
Reading specs from
/BUILD/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/pgcc-2.93.17/specs
gcc version pgcc-2.93.17 19990405 (gcc2 ss-980929 experimental)

-- With best regards, Alexander.

Sigh.  I like to think it's just the Linux people who want to be
on the "leading edge"  so bad they walk right off the precipice.