Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 22:37:27 +0300 (EEST) From: Jussi Hamalainen X-Sender: count AT shodan DOT irccrew DOT org To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: List archive? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by delorie.com id OAA27731 Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Andrew Dodd wrote: > And, of course, the patch should be taken down, or at least marked as > "severely broken, no one can compile this" on the PGCC page. Obviously their code was not very thoroughly tested. I wonder wether they tested it at all and if they did, how on Earth did they get the thing to compile successfully? This seems like the Microsoft attitude: "It compiled? The first screen came up? Ship it!". > That PGCC-1.1.2 patch probably should have been marked as an alpha or > beta. :) IMHO it shouldn't have found its way to the web page at all since it obviously is very broken. -=[ Count Zero / TBH - Jussi Hämäläinen - email count AT theblah DOT org ]=-