Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 19:55:30 +0200
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: pgcc-1.1.1 glibc-2.1.1 strptime.c forbidden register
Message-ID: <19990411195530.C461@cerebro.party>
Mail-Followup-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 02 DOT 9904090755400 DOT 745-100000 AT isis DOT bticc DOT net> <21886 DOT 923686973 AT upchuck> <19990409234033 DOT A31824 AT win DOT tue DOT nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <19990409234033.A31824@win.tue.nl>; from Ronald de Man on Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 11:40:33PM +0200
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.2.5 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.93.09 19990221 (gcc2 ss-980929 experimental) executing gcc version 2.7.2.3) 
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 11:40:33PM +0200, Ronald de Man wrote:
> 
> Doesn't -O6 already include -fomit-frame-pointer?

Yes.

> And how does this explain that compiling without optimization solves the
> problem?

pgcc was even more agrressive in allocating registers.

--  
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |