Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 21:16:06 -0500 (EST)
From: "Dan Melomedman (free video eden)" <danm AT recomnet DOT recomnet DOT net>
To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: 
In-Reply-To: <19990316151501.E3343@cerebro.laendle>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990316211437.2929A-100000@recomnet.recomnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: pgcc AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Marc Lehmann wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 03:28:52AM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> > 
> > Well, haven't they exposed one of those 8-way 2GB Xeon-Boxes 
> 
> Kill Xeon ;)
> 
> > I would be strongly interested in a
> > 8-way _K7_ 600MHz 4GB XBAR UWSCSI2/IEEE-1394 machine
> 
> As I said often before, the K7 has IMHO a very very great potential!
> 
> --  
>       -----==-                                             |
>       ----==-- _                                           |
>       ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
>       --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com      |e|
>       -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
>     The choice of a GNU generation                       |
>                                                          |
> 
It has potential only if Intel will not come up with a next Pentium.
Imagine Intel coming out with Pentium IV, with a new set of instructions,
and not willing to license their technology to AMD.