X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs- Message-ID: <19980927190620.C651@nights.dhis.org> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 19:06:20 +0200 From: Matthias Dahl To: Marc Lehmann Subject: Re: Huge Problems with PGCC 1.1 :-( Reply-To: matthew AT nights DOT dhis DOT org References: <19980926113359 DOT A1249 AT nights DOT dhis DOT org> <19980926214709 DOT A15553 AT cerebro DOT laendle> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.1i In-Reply-To: <19980926214709.A15553@cerebro.laendle>; from Marc Lehmann on Sat, Sep 26, 1998 at 09:47:09PM +0200 X-Operating-System: LinuX 2.0.36pre1 Sender: Marc Lehmann Status: RO X-Status: A Content-Length: 1088 Lines: 25 On Sat, Sep 26, 1998 at 09:47:09PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: > The 2.0 kernel versions do not work with any newer compiler. Nobody will fix > them to do so, either. Your only option for linux-2.0 is to use gcc-2.7.2. Well, I just wondered why everything below PGCC 1.1 worked fine and compiled the Kernel without any problems... :) > No, but known serious issues with linux-2.0 ;) Ok, I'm going to install the old gcc later as a second compiler. :-) Do you know how safe it has already become to use one of the 2.1.x kernels? Is there already a release date for the 2.2 (the last was October, AFAIK)? Last question. :) I'm considering downloading the source for XFree86, but is there a chance at all, that it will compile with PGCC 1.1? Thanks 4 your time and patience. C'ya... -- ]\ MATTHEW @ NIGHTS.dhis.org / PGP Key @ Request via eMail \ \ WEB Master of the / / Powered by LINUX 2.0.36pre1 / Dynamic Host Information System \ ]\ The Choice of a GNU Generation \ http://www.dhis.org /