X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Message-ID: <001701bdea06$4092ae60$840560c3@kiwi128-1>
From: "Kiwi128" <kiwi128 AT geocities DOT com>
To: "Marc Lehmann" <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Subject: Re: problems with 19980921
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 13:01:58 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status: RO
Content-Length: 2311
Lines: 63

well...i compiled 0921 with -O6 -mpentium and the two fpu opts. that are
allowed...
but it passed all test at the end...and bzip2 0.9b compiled with 0921 then
with the
same flags worx perfect....
i have compiled and run 2.0.35 a few 36 pre patches and all dev kernels
(inc. pres)
since umm..115 or something...it always was perfect...so...with the same
flags
as above....
well..i can't get my 2.1.122.conf right now (have to recover my linux
first)..
but it's hmm...everything in module that isn't really needed for booting...
(i always do this)...2940 support...UP...well...

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To: beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
Date: Saturday, September 26, 1998 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: problems with 19980921


>On Sat, Sep 26, 1998 at 02:56:09AM +0200, Kiwi128 wrote:
>> the version.c had 2.92.11 instead of 2.92.09 so i didn't get patched...i
>> manually
>> wrote "pgcc-2.92.09"...
>
>Hmm.. the egcs snapshot was delayed, and they probably changed something
>between me making the patch and jeff making the egcs snapshot ;)
>
>> i compiled it with pgcc11
>
>with -O2 or lower, I hope?
>
>> i setup 2.1.122 with ac2, apm and aic7xxx 5.1.0pre12 patches (ac2 patch
from
>> that uk.linux site or something)
>
>-ac2, +SMP, +isdn and you have almost my setup..
>
>> bootdisk says "syslinux....blah...loading.....ok now booting the
>> kernel"...BAM...that's it...
>> done...
>
>Which options did you use for compiling the kernel?
>
>>
>> it's p200 w/o mmx...128mb edo ram (not broken)..2940uw...quatum 4 gig
>> uw...root=/dev/sda2...
>> yeah that's it...or r the sources broken?
>
>Not that I'd know. At the moment, with linux using a problematic gcc
>feature, I'd say better do not compile your kernel with pgcc or egcs (or
>gcc-2.8). _my_ system works fine (with -O6 -mpentiumpro), but that does not
>mean anything..
>
>      -----==-                                              |
>      ----==-- _                                            |
>      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
>      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com       |e|
>      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
>    The choice of a GNU generation                        |
>                                                          |