X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 15:05:43 +0200 (MET DST) From: Joerg Dalkolmo X-Sender: kolmo AT iris To: Marc Lehmann cc: beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl Subject: Re: syntax error while compiling pgcc-1.1 In-Reply-To: <19980916202732.39522@cerebro.laendle> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Marc Lehmann Status: RO Content-Length: 1894 Lines: 53 On Wed, 16 Sep 1998, Marc Lehmann wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 04:40:17AM +0200, Joerg Dalkolmo wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Sep 1998, Marc Lehmann wrote: > > > > I have downloaded egcs-1.1b.tar.bz2 and egcs-1.1b-pgcc-1.1.diff.gz. > > Then I have done the following steps on two machines: > > (Linux-PCs, running kernel 2.0.0 and 2.0.30. Compiler gcc-2.7.2) > > > > The compilation stopped on each machine at the same position. > > That looks very fine. > > > Perhaps while downloading and/or uncompressing one of the tar/diff-files > > In that case you really hsould have gotten reject files, patch usually > doesn't apply broken diffs. I've no idea what happenned, probably some > discrepancy between my source and the diff, but I found nothing broken in it > :( > > BTW, some versions of patch are broken (IMHO all versions between and > including patch-2.2 and patch-2.5 ;), maybe, as a last resort, try using > another patch program (2.5.3 is recommended for linux, but its only an alpha > version). Funny, funny, I can't get this stuff working 8-). To make sure having a clean start I downloaded egcs-1.1b.tar and egcs-1.1b-pgcc-1.1.diff again from ftp.fu-berlin.de. Because Marc mentioned a "bad" patch-program (on my distribution, S.u.S.E-Linux 4.2, there is patch-2.1) I tried patch-2.5 AND patch-2.5.3, but I ended up with the same error message at the same position. I'm going mad, hehehe! Here is the 'configuration' of the machine I am working at the moment: Linux-PC-100MHz (S.u.S.E-Linux 4.2) Compiler gcc-2.7.2 libc.so.4.7.6 libc.so.5.2.18 patch-2.1 (now patch-2.5.3) gzip-1.2.4 bunzip-0.1pl2 ....what else could be informative? Any ideas? Joerg ----------------------------------------------------------- Joerg Dalkolmo ( mailto:kolmo AT geophys DOT uni-stuttgart DOT de ) Institute of Geophysics, University of Stuttgart, Germany ( http://www.geophys.uni-stuttgart.de )