X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs- Message-ID: <19980916210526.61838@cerebro.laendle> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 21:05:26 +0200 From: Marc Lehmann To: beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl Subject: Re: RPM (was Re: libc-5.4.22?!?) Mail-Followup-To: beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from Dr H. T. Leung on Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 11:18:11AM +0100 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.1.120 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release)) Status: RO Content-Length: 1426 Lines: 27 On Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 11:18:11AM +0100, Dr H. T. Leung wrote: > Oh, I have definitely used the rpm system. I d/loaded it from RedHat and > installed it (of course I did not have a RedHat dist in the first place). > But nobody ever told me the one important fact: I can't resist an add one more thing: - the last time I tried (granted, a year ago), I only found srpms with the rpm software. No .tgz, or at least it was well hidden. - The srpms I extracted my first (and last) rpm insisted on a pre-installed rpm.config (or whatever), and nowhere was documented what should be in it. This has made many people (not only me) mad, and gave rpm a very bad start, although the idea is very good. Obviously, rpm is nonstandard and can't be manipulated by standard unix tools (cpio, tar..), whereas standard unix packages can (because they are cpio'd cpios ;) While rpm is one of the best management system around (when it works), anybody claiming it has no design bugs is ignoring reality ;) -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |