X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Message-ID: <19980718174534.40362@cerebro.laendle>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 17:45:34 +0200
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To: beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
Subject: Re: PGCC's optimizations (continued)
Mail-Followup-To: beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 32 DOT 19980716182614 DOT 009352b0 AT xs4all DOT nl> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 00 DOT 9807180704160 DOT 189-100000 AT nuklear DOT steelcity DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.00.9807180704160.189-100000@nuklear.steelcity.net>; from nuke@bayside.net on Sat, Jul 18, 1998 at 07:12:54AM -0400
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.1.108 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.91.43 19980628 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental)) 
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1091
Lines: 24

On Sat, Jul 18, 1998 at 07:12:54AM -0400, nuke AT bayside DOT net wrote:
> > 
> > Porting from (p)gcc to msvc/watcom is hard because msvc/watcom are horrible
> > in casting. You must cast everything.

This is quite interesting... are you sure that you compile these programs in
C mode as opposed to mcirosofts combined c-c++ thing? In C, there are many
clearly defined type conversions which need an explicit cast in C++.

> >On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
> 
> Nuke, 1 big note: i'm not interested in HOW long it takes to compile stuff,
> nor did i compare executable size. I'm only interested in how fast
> my program is.

I hope he meant that also!

      -----==-                                              |
      ----==-- _                                            |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com       |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                        |
                                                          |